| Gilles Reverdin
has been a researcher since 1981 at CNRS (a French public research organization)
and has worked in the United States at MIT (1981-1982) and as a research
scientist at Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory (1990-1994). He attended the
École Normale de la rue d'Ulm in Paris from 1976 to 1980. His research
interests include the mechanisms of low frequency variability of the oceans
and climate system, oceanographic data, and mesoscale observational studies.
The North Atlantic subarctic gyre, a region
of relatively cold surface water, experiences large variability at interannual
to interdecadal time scales, both in the atmosphere and in the ocean.
A major component in the atmospheric variability is the North Atlantic
Oscillation (NAO), which is associated with atmospheric pressure deviations
of one sign near Iceland and southern Greenland and the opposite sign
near the Azores (40°N). The NAO modulates the dominant westerly
winds. These large changes in atmospheric circulation have an important
impact on European and eastern North American climates. The ocean surface
temperature is variable at decadal time scales, with evidence of propagation
of the signal from the southwest to the northeast part of the gyre. The
processes of propagation and the nature of the coupling between the ocean
and the atmosphere are not yet well defined.
The surface waters of the Nordic Seas are
renewed rather rapidly due to the presence of a deep water formation north
of the ridges between Greenland and Scotland. Dense, cold water flows
south across the ridge and plunges into the deep North Atlantic, entraining
upper ocean water along the way. Winter convection also renews the intermediate
waters of the North Atlantic in the central Labrador Sea. These surface
waters are replaced mostly by warm and salty waters originating from the
Gulf Stream via the North Atlantic Current circulation. To a lesser extent,
surface waters are replaced by cold, fresh water from the Arctic, brought
to the area by narrow currents flowing mostly along the shelf breaks of
Greenland and Labrador and often covered by sea ice in winter. The air-sea
heat exchange rapidly (a few years) cools the warm North Atlantic water
as it flows to the north and around the subarctic gyre. This results in
the entrainment of deeper water rich in nutrients into the surface layer.
Thus, the North Atlantic subarctic gyre is a productive biological area
where large phytoplankton blooms occur in late spring and summer. These
blooms correspond to high chlorophyll concentrations visible by satellite
imagery (for example in the recent SeaWifs ocean color images). High production
depletes the surface layers of carbon and, therefore, of dissolved carbon
dioxide. This, together with a cooling effect on dissolved carbon dioxide,
contributes to a disequilibrium in carbon dioxide across the air-sea interface
so that the ocean can absorb large amounts of carbon dioxide from the
atmosphere.
Scientific investigation from merchant vessels
traveling between Iceland and Newfoundland was initiated in 1985 on ships
of the Icelandic company EIMSKIP by Fred Dobson of the Bedford Institute
of Oceanography in Halifax, Nova Scotia. The initial program, which lasted
until 1993, was designed to investigate the seasonal and interannual variability
in heat content of the upper ocean between Newfoundland and Iceland. About
four times a year, roughly 24 expendable bathythermograph (XBT) probes
are launched by the ship's officers during one crossing. A continuous
plankton recorder (CPR) was towed from the same vessel to investigate
the distribution of large plankton species and concentration of phytoplankton.
The CPR was operated by the Sir Alister Hardy Foundation for Ocean Sciences
of Plymouth, UK. This ship route is labeled AX2 by the international World
Ocean Circulation Experiment (WOCE). In late 1993, the sampling rate was
increased. Since then, additional XBTs have been launched during 22 transits
by a scientific observer in the southern region where eddy variability
is expected to be larger. The observer also collected water samples to
measure salinity, analyze surface nutrients, and study plankton. For a
while, surface samples were collected for oxygen isotope and tritium concentrations
in the surface water. The ship was equipped in early 1994 with a thermosalinograph
(TSG) to continuously measure temperature and salinity. Recently, it has
served as a platform for rawinsondes with 263 launched in 1998. Rawinsondes
record wind, temperature, and humidity profiles, information that is important
for meteorological forecasts in the Northern Atlantic.
The Icelandic company EIMSKIP owns both
the MV Skogafoss and its replacement, the MV Godafoss. The
XBT data have been transmitted in real time since early 1994, and hourly
averages of the TSG data have been transmitted in real time since the
spring of 1996. The data return is somewhat lower than was anticipated,
but the overall project has developed as initially envisioned. Thermal
sampling in the autumn has been less regular, in particular between late
August 1997 and January 1998. We have had to reject more than ten percent
of the XBT data because the XBT wire had touched the ship's hull and corrupted
the electric circuit. This happens more often during winter storms. The
sampling is less dense north of 56°N, with little data north of 60°N.
The TSG salinity data are often accurate to within 0.015 practical salinity
units (PSU) but were of low quality before March 1996 because of poor
weather and sporadic sampling. Figure 1 indicates
the route of the vessel between Iceland and Newfoundland by showing the
locations of all XBTs taken between December 1993 and January 1999.
Individual temperature sections indicate
some mesoscale variability and variability of the larger gyre scale structure.
Figure 2a south of 55°N is quite typical, with cold water trapped
in the upper 200 meters close to the shelf edge off Newfoundland and warmer
water 600-800km offshore. The warmer water reflects the presence of the
North Atlantic current which loops anticyclonically in the southern Labrador
Sea (called the Northwest Corner). The North
Atlantic Current is also often characterized by higher surface salinity.
The temperature minimum near 55°N (900km on Figure 2a) is common and
has been associated with an outflow of water from the Labrador Sea. These
hydrographic features remain evident in the average section (see Fig.
2b), with isotherms deepening north of 55°N. This deepening is associated
with the crossing into the cyclonic circulation of the Irminger Sea (see
article by Mork and Pérez-Brunius). The average March winter mixed-layer
depth is plotted (dashed line) and indicates a deepening of the mixed
layer north of 55°N, where the section crosses the Irminger Current.
It might be added that these differences in water masses have been observed
to include different biological characteristics, in particular in the
assemblage of different copepod species.
Although sampling has not been sufficient
to follow the variability associated with the Northwest Corner of the
North Atlantic Current, and it does not resolve the fine scales associated
with the Labrador Current, it has been instrumental in resolving the large-scale
changes of the temperature structure and surface salinity. The temperature
variability is illustrated on a time-latitude plot at 100 meters. Figure
3a indicates a warming of most of the section
since early 1994, with most warming occurring in late 1995-early 1996
and late 1997-early 1998. The exception near 52°N corresponds to the
Northwest corner where the variability does not seem to correlate with
the other parts of the section. What is seen at 100m depth is typical
of other depths in the upper ocean with variability that decreases with
depth more slowly north of 55°N than south of it. The greatest temperature
variability near 56°N-60°N seems to correspond at least in part
with changes in the isotherm slope across the Irminger Current. Surface
salinity (Figure 3b) also increases north of 55°N, with low salinity
before 1997 and higher salinity after. This increase does not seem to
occur farther south, even in the Labrador Current, which is the site of
a large seasonal variability of the anomalies. This suggests that the
waters in the Labrador Current are subject to other factors such as varying
fresh water supply from the north. An earlier analysis of observations
from 1993 to 1995, which were years of large ice cover, suggests a lower
winter near-surface salinity than for later years which were ice-free
in the southern part of the Labrador Current. The salinity and temperature
variability near 52°N reflects the meandering of the North Atlantic
Current where it turns east at the northwest corner.
The absence of salinity profiles makes
it difficult to investigate changes in the density of the upper water
column in this region, where the watermass properties evolve on similar
time scales to that of the surface. It is, nonetheless, plausible to assume
that salinity changes observed at the surface take place in the upper
water column as well. Together, these temperature and salinity changes
should contribute noticeably to the surface sea level increase of more
than 8cm which has been observed with satellite altimetry. Changes in
the heat exchanged with the atmosphere have contributed to the upper ocean
warming, although available data suggest that this can explain only a
third of the warming. The remaining warming has to result from change
in the circulation of the ocean. Longer time series and further analysis
of additional data available for the subarctic gyre, either from other
ships of opportunity (i.e. the Nuka Arctica), or from in situ or
satellite observations (for example, temperature and salinity profiles
from profiling floats or sea level from altimetry) will be instrumental
in better understanding the variability and the role of the ocean on climate
variability in the northern North Atlantic sector. The ships of opportunity
programs are instrumental in providing the basic sampling from which such
analyses can be made.
Acknowledgments
The company EIMSKIP and the ships' masters and crews have been extremely
welcoming, the main reason for the success of this sampling program. Cooperation
between scientists from different institutions is also key. I am indebted
to NOAA for its support, and, in particular, AOML (Warren Krug), Norfolk
(Jim Farrington), and my colleagues in France and at LDEO. Logistical
help by the Institute for Marine Research in Reykjavik (Iceland) and by
Tom Rossby at URI were also very important.
|
 |